I ask, as I feel at some stage I might want to show that other arguments are equivalent to that, so would be helpful now to agree with a simple example that such arguments are invalid. Such arguments are not logically invalid - they are perfect proofs that God cannot be omnipotent!! Therefore no omnipotent God can exist!
Re: This year's CICCU Main Event - DIRECTION
Such arguments are not logically invalid - they are perfect proofs that God cannot be omnipotent!! Therefore no omnipotent God can exist!