Date: 2006-10-29 09:45 pm (UTC)
The real split that the discussion revealed wasn't between religion and science but some kind of deep philosophical split - demonstrated by the gravity comment.

I don't know enough about philosophy to label the different viewpoints. Can anyone help me out? Is F's point of view postmodernist? What about ours?

It seemed, as Paul says, a split between Maths/Science and Arts, but I'm interested in how our philosophies got so different that we couldn't really communicate.

My tentative theory is this. There are two 'worlds' in which we usually have to succeed - the world of physical stuff (mostly inanimate) and the world of human interaction. People's beliefs don't affect how most physical stuff behaves (e.g. the orbit of the moon, growth of a tree) but have big effects in the human world. Asking someone to do something for you, giving them gifts etc does wonders in the human world but the lightening tends to ignore you.

If your education means that you spend most time dealing with one of these worlds to the exclusion of the other, you end up thinking that everything works like that. Extreme result - someone who thinks gravity only works if you believe in it or alternatively someone who is unable to relate to other people. Stereotype arts/science students??
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

nameandnature: Giles from Buffy (Default)
nameandnature

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
910 1112131415
1617 1819202122
2324252627 28 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 04:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios