If you accepts that absolute morality exists and that this requires there to be a God (and you're right), it gets you a step closer to the truth. It would rule out atheism so further time spent on investigating the problem could be spent more profitably.
That it doesn't demonstrate which God is the correct one is not a flaw, as that was not the purpose of the argument. From there you can look at other arguments and evidence to determine which God you think is the correct one.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-11-22 11:18 am (UTC)If you accepts that absolute morality exists and that this requires there to be a God (and you're right), it gets you a step closer to the truth. It would rule out atheism so further time spent on investigating the problem could be spent more profitably.
That it doesn't demonstrate which God is the correct one is not a flaw, as that was not the purpose of the argument. From there you can look at other arguments and evidence to determine which God you think is the correct one.