I'm not sure the success of the Census Campaign would do much more than annoy those Christians who like to bang on about how this is a Christian country in online discussions. But that seems a worthy goal, so I'm happy to support it.
You never know, it might even help get the bishops out of the Lords, which would be even better.
The poster on the right wasn't endorsed by Gumbel or McDonalds (in fact, I'm told Gumbel got the quote from Keith Green): it's a mashup from Hampshire Humanists which Crispian Jago found. His site has plenty of other census posters for you to enjoy.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 08:40 am (UTC)I think being culturally Christian is definitely something (I would sometimes refer to myself as Christian, in comparison to my Jewish fiance) but we don't really have an umbrella for it, and I heartily agree that "no religion" is a better description than "Christian" for the set of people...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:40 am (UTC)Also, I find the following four groups of people annoying: atheists who think they're a persecuted minority; Christians who think they're a persecuted minority; atheists who think the country should be run their way because they're a large majority; Christians who think the country should be run their way because they're a large majority. I hope that if the census campaign succeeds it should shut at least two out of four up.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 12:48 pm (UTC)I neither support nor oppose this campaign, because I can't see the point in it at all.
In fact I don't even know why I'm writing this. I must be very bored.
S.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 10:44 pm (UTC)Only demographers, social scientists, doctors, statisticians, civil servants, local councils, economists, marketers, planners, and similar riffraff. No-one who matters, really.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-11 10:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 12:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-10 08:01 pm (UTC)Andrew R
no subject
Date: 2011-03-13 10:46 pm (UTC)Perhaps I have got that wrong.
Or perhaps Paul did.
Romans 8
For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters. And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 10:46 am (UTC)That's....odd. I recognise it may be true in law, but it's probably the oddest thing that could happen to the most explicity opt-in major religious community. I would recognise this of both Hinduism and Judaism (you're born a Hindu whether you like it or not), but not Sikhism. Wonder why UK law thinks so?